An Artist’s Window on Tradition: Who is Exploiting Whom?

Date:

Share post:


As a figurative sculptor I’ve spent much of my life turning over the questions of exploitation in viewing the body. As a male artist, when I depict a female body, how much of my response is authentic and how much a matter of our cultural socialization we refer to as the “male gaze”? What am I to do if the model that shows up is pretty close to the idea body type that our patriarchal culture prefers? If I depict what I see there are going to be those who feel the model is objectified, whereas if the model is overweight or old or misshapen, not so much. What does a non-exploitive depiction look like? Often the answers seem to reveal more about the speaker than resolving the situation. So here’s my take:

Yes, the patriarchy objectifies women (as well as most of nature!) That’s horrid and we should work against it. But Nature is also what created our bodies and it’s quite clear that for a human, another human body is the most beautiful thing there is! All the more so with young, healthy women. I suspect that’s because each of us was born of a body that looks like that; so that body becomes unconsciously the image of The Divine (She who created and sustains us.) I can certainly see how anyone who’s been objectified rails against another’s suffering the same. But this does not negate my own experience. I see in the woman both a sexual animal and an “object” of beauty. Does that mean I’m objectifying her? I’m aware how women artists can depict the female body sexually (VERY common in women artists!) without accusations of objectification. That doesn’t so much mean they’re free from that fault, but that that’s OK in the patriarchy. 

We cannot see beauty without delighting in our experience of it. The same happens to me with sexual arousal. Yet I too bristle at images of sexy women that hints at nothing beyond. I delight in my experience. If you enjoy a good meal are you objectifying your food? A sunset? These are the tough questions.

In the end there’s no winning this argument, there’s only learning. When I hear the conversation come up it becomes clear (since everyone has a dog in this fight) that the best answers are always going to be subjective. So please do respond to an image, but then listen to yourself… What do you learn?

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

spot_img

Related articles

How Leonardo da Vinci’s Lost ‘Salvator Mundi’ Sold for $80 Million

Leonardo da Vinci’s ‘Salvator Mundi,’ a masterpiece that has captivated the art world for centuries, took a remarkable...

Who is Van Gogh’s Lover?

Vincent van Gogh, the enigmatic Dutch post-impressionist painter, is revered for his emotive works that capture the essence...

Avionna Green: Exploring Boundaries and Connections Through Art

Avionna Green is an artist whose work stems from a deep desire to express her inner world, blending...

兒童創意課堂:學習藝術大師風格

兒童藝術課程 透過有趣且引人入勝的藝術課程來釋放孩子的創造力,該課程旨在探索各種藝術風格和技巧。這個為期 7 週的課程向孩子們介紹著名的藝術運動和藝術家,同時教導他們基本的繪畫技巧。每週都會專注於一個新主題,從立體派到印象派,讓學生嘗試不同的風格並創作自己的傑作。這些課程非常適合渴望學習的年輕藝術家,將在支持性的教育環境中激發和鼓勵創造力。 價格:14堂課1,400美元。 第一週:基本形狀簡介 - 第 1 課:介紹不同的基本形狀 - 第 2 課:使用畢卡索立體主義風格的基本形狀繪製簡單的物體 第 2 週:線條和圖案 - 第 3 課:理解受喬治修拉的點畫法啟發的不同類型的線條 - 第 4 課:在類似梵谷印象派風格的繪畫中創造圖案和紋理 第 3...